[Poll] Rerun event: Clash of the Titans

[Reeves]

You were told to "suck it up". And you indeed sucked it up, didn't even consider saying a word about it.

To an extent, do not forget, that after the first wave the event have drastically changed. To be precise, the following changes were taken:

• Cruisers have now been under the command of actual players, and not NPCs, which excluded any aiming issues.
  
• The cruisers, starting from the second wave, had significantly weaker armor than the initially spawned NPCs.
  
• Freelancers have been excluded from participation for either of the sides.
  
• The outcome was pretty much a draw, yet another "zero sum scenario", where either of the sides got what was proposed: Beurvay have been turned into a wreck, but Athos have been relocated to New London. Nothing really changed for the Gallic side, it even became easier for their allies to operate on the theater.
  In fact, none of the sides were harmed significantly with the outcome of this event.
  

If you are not pleased with it's outcome - have some guts to openly state your opinion.
If you don't have the guts - you should just suck it up, which is exactly what you did.
You have no one to blame but yourself.

The first wave counted, and the final wave had an additional cruiser. That removed any chance of a Gallic victory when the event had even finished yet.

What i am trying to point out is that:

• All the issues were taken into consideration after the first wave, and were generally fixed throughout the following waves.
  
• The event have ended as a draw, with the proposed outcomes for both sides brought to be live in the server environment.
  

Also, if either of the sides saw some general incosistency throughout the event - why not point out to these matters rather than just maintaining low profile about it initially and using it latter on the forums to play "victims of circumstances"?

What is the logic behind it?

Nobody is playing victim. I certainly don't see any claims for compensation, damages or redressal for time wasted and grievances caused. People just don't want preferential treatment and they want the logic that was applied to the last event to be applied to this one. That is in essence, the fact that where was no need for a repeat of the event and certainly no need to make the "victim" liable for any shortcomings of the organiser.

---