(01-25-2019, 05:52 AM)Grumblesaur Wrote: [quote="diamond1" pid='2058648' dateline='1548391837']
Snacs need fixing. Not cruise disruptors.
That's really, really not the topic at hand.
Relation to topic :
Core game mechanic -> changes to core game mechanic -> adverse and very poor outcome -> another attempt to change a core mechanic -> fear of unwanted change that is, history repeating itself -> Snac references -> validated.
Your point good sir?
Cheers
Quote:You can talk about the SNAC in a SNAC thread. If you're going to respond to every balance suggestion you don't like with "nope, you'll break it, history repeating itself", what's the point? Make a poll or post in flood if you're not interested in discussing anything.
*sigh
Refer to my quote above for clarificafion on relation to this thread. I don’t want to waste time repeating myself.
With regards to your second point,
There is substantial evidence about how detrimental this “suggestion” you so deeply consent to is going to be if ( and that being a big if) implemented. The POINT is that we have the ability to learn from mistakes made in the past. Similar to how one wouldn’t touch a hot pan after being so stubborn to touch it resulting in forced learning approach with lasting consequences.
Polls have been made and the community has spoken time and time again.
The flood is for trolling, are you insinuating that I am here to troll because I have a separate opinion supported by hard facts?