• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Interactive DarkMap
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Unofficial Factions and Groups
« Previous 1 … 88 89 90 91 92 … 392 Next »
Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback
Offline Markam
06-03-2019, 01:58 PM,
#29
Templar Enthusiast
Posts: 1,865
Threads: 122
Joined: Aug 2008

The thread has devolved into mud throwing at this point, but I will continue to provide answers if you insist on continuing.

Quote:This new rush by various groups to have the staff enforce your will instead of doing so ingame and within your roleplay rights is disgusting and you should be ashamed for it.

We submitted the request because this applies to all users of the cell, rather than FR5 every single player who ups and uses them. We took a long term approach rather than taking down everyone who uses our tech without mercy. We tried to engage with Kalh despite the fact he made no attempt to contact us prior to penning the RP. Our feedback was not met very positively either. Seeing him using it in Bering (yes, oorply) triggered the decision that we needed to sort this out once and for all. Again, I must restate that we do not believe LN indies should use our caps (Dunkirk specifically) at 90%, especially when we have denied both [LN] and 5th| (recently in-fact).

You are suggesting we shut him down without mercy, the staff may provide an alternative solution that could work for him. I do not think you have the right to demand we use faction rights, do you?


Quote:Nice joke. You brought every cap in your arsenal to try and roll over the RHA, to no avail of course.

This was picked up on by more than just you, but you were the latest so sorry, you are getting quoted. While I don't get to join every attack due to time zone and real life commitments, the ones I joined we did not use the 3 BC's mentioned previously. To my knowledge, we specifically, upon request by the 5th|, ordered no LN caps be used. As for those ships, firstly, one is [SIS] and not BAF, so no comment, secondly, there may have been confusion as to whether the LLBC is LN tech anymore, but I agree that is flimsy justification, so I agree they should not have taken part. I am sure some will argue that point either way.

It was not sanctioned, not recommended, not suggested. I would have stopped it if I were online.

Here is the answers, though I am not sure if answers are what you are seeking by posting in this thread. At least Kalh can benefit from them.

[Image: jVk71cR.png][Image: CNwiaZq.png]
Markam is evil
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 06:02 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Stolt. - 06-03-2019, 06:48 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Skorak - 06-03-2019, 06:57 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 07:00 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Lucas - 06-03-2019, 07:52 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 07:59 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Laura C. - 06-03-2019, 08:45 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 08:51 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Laura C. - 06-03-2019, 08:56 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Lythrilux - 06-03-2019, 08:51 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 08:54 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Markam - 06-03-2019, 08:54 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Egon Bigmemes - 06-03-2019, 09:52 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 10:00 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Wesker - 06-03-2019, 01:41 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 09:04 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by TheSauron - 06-03-2019, 09:16 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 09:18 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Laura C. - 06-03-2019, 09:33 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by TheSauron - 06-03-2019, 09:32 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 09:35 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Sombs - 06-03-2019, 09:51 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 09:52 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kauket - 06-03-2019, 10:02 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Markam - 06-03-2019, 11:30 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Egon Bigmemes - 06-03-2019, 11:42 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Markam - 06-03-2019, 11:51 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Egon Bigmemes - 06-03-2019, 11:54 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Markam - 06-03-2019, 01:58 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Wildkins - 06-03-2019, 06:10 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Markam - 06-04-2019, 02:30 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Its Raisu - 06-04-2019, 03:25 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Spectre - 06-03-2019, 06:44 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 08:31 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Miaou - 06-03-2019, 08:32 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 08:33 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Miaou - 06-03-2019, 08:46 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 08:48 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Miaou - 06-03-2019, 08:53 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 09:42 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Backo - 06-03-2019, 08:50 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Thunderer - 06-03-2019, 09:41 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Spectre - 06-04-2019, 03:58 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Jayce - 06-04-2019, 04:02 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode