• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Unofficial Factions and Groups
« Previous 1 … 85 86 87 88 89 … 388 Next »
Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback
Offline Wildkins
06-03-2019, 06:10 PM,
#30
Freeport 3
Posts: 1,943
Threads: 175
Joined: Feb 2013

I was gonna stay out of all this until the hot takes about tech-cells and things we have and haven't done came up.

Markam, if BAF| didn't want BAF tech to be used against Unioners in Bering, then why did they approve =LSF= to use Challengers when we specifically told them we'd use them in Bering, against Unioners and Harmony?

The [LN]-LNS-North.Bridge, a Churchill from the original lend-lease, also took part. If we're going off of that, I suppose [LN] is breaking the treaty, as well. Despite the fact that the terms of the tech exchange that our cells is based off of specifically states:

Quote:There is only one request which our board would like to state about the usage of our ships. If its possible do not send them against Rheinland Forces unless their involvement is critical.

Last I checked, Unioners aren't Rheinland Forces yet. If Bretonia wishes to see them that way and chase down Liberty for using them, then let's do that inRP.

And, just a small correction, but, as far as I'm aware, the [LN] hasn't asked for a Dunkirk since before 2014. Not sure on that one because Disco's forum search has always been horrendous.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not a massive fan of the Dunkirk RP either, but this is a little silly. If we need to break the last five years of how we've actually dealt with these problems to just remove indie cap cells, well, I suppose we can reciprocate just to make it even and fair. Not that it matters, since Bretonia already has a carbon copy of the only ship we have that matters, but y'know.

RP Feedback
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 06:02 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Stolt. - 06-03-2019, 06:48 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Skorak - 06-03-2019, 06:57 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 07:00 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Lucas - 06-03-2019, 07:52 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 07:59 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Laura C. - 06-03-2019, 08:45 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 08:51 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Laura C. - 06-03-2019, 08:56 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Lythrilux - 06-03-2019, 08:51 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 08:54 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Markam - 06-03-2019, 08:54 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Egon Bigmemes - 06-03-2019, 09:52 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 10:00 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Wesker - 06-03-2019, 01:41 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 09:04 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by TheSauron - 06-03-2019, 09:16 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 09:18 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Laura C. - 06-03-2019, 09:33 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by TheSauron - 06-03-2019, 09:32 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 09:35 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Sombs - 06-03-2019, 09:51 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 09:52 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kauket - 06-03-2019, 10:02 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Markam - 06-03-2019, 11:30 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Egon Bigmemes - 06-03-2019, 11:42 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Markam - 06-03-2019, 11:51 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Egon Bigmemes - 06-03-2019, 11:54 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Markam - 06-03-2019, 01:58 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Wildkins - 06-03-2019, 06:10 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Markam - 06-04-2019, 02:30 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Its Raisu - 06-04-2019, 03:25 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Spectre - 06-03-2019, 06:44 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 08:31 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Miaou - 06-03-2019, 08:32 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 08:33 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Miaou - 06-03-2019, 08:46 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 08:48 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Miaou - 06-03-2019, 08:53 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 09:42 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Backo - 06-03-2019, 08:50 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Thunderer - 06-03-2019, 09:41 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Spectre - 06-04-2019, 03:58 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Jayce - 06-04-2019, 04:02 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode