• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Interactive DarkMap
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Unofficial Factions and Groups
« Previous 1 … 88 89 90 91 92 … 392 Next »
Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback
Offline Miaou
06-03-2019, 08:46 PM,
#35
Cat Pilot
Posts: 1,642
Threads: 131
Joined: Mar 2009

(06-03-2019, 08:33 PM)Kalhmera Wrote:
(06-03-2019, 08:32 PM)Miaou Wrote:
(06-03-2019, 08:31 PM)Kalhmera Wrote: Its highly suspicious for years indies had this cell and when I do some RP there is suddenly a problem.

Maybe because nobody has made it a problem until you did.

If there was a written statement posted saying indies cant use the ship please link it. If not then I was not the problem. You are.

I'm not an advocate of removing any cells. I personally think it's silly for both LN and BAF to have each other's capital ships at 90% or 100% (depending on ID) but I don't think the removal of cells is the solution to one outlying vessel.

This said, I don't like people who see a ship and want to become a snowflake vessel, make it, then try to justify it after the fact as was done for the Cambridge. If there was roleplay leading up to the ship's existence within Liberty, say way back before the wars or some other example, then sure. I can see the Liberty Navy having such a ship. But instead it was just made and given justification after the fact. The reason for the argument to take away cells is due to you showing that people can not be responsible enough to show a thread of reasoning. If this is the right call to make, I don't think so.

Regardless, this is the problem you caused. At least own up to it and don't deflect your poor choices on others.

Characters & Stories
  Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 06:02 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Stolt. - 06-03-2019, 06:48 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Skorak - 06-03-2019, 06:57 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 07:00 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Lucas - 06-03-2019, 07:52 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 07:59 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Laura C. - 06-03-2019, 08:45 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 08:51 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Laura C. - 06-03-2019, 08:56 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Lythrilux - 06-03-2019, 08:51 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 08:54 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Markam - 06-03-2019, 08:54 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Egon Bigmemes - 06-03-2019, 09:52 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 10:00 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Wesker - 06-03-2019, 01:41 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 09:04 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by TheSauron - 06-03-2019, 09:16 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 09:18 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Laura C. - 06-03-2019, 09:33 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by TheSauron - 06-03-2019, 09:32 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 09:35 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Sombs - 06-03-2019, 09:51 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 09:52 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kauket - 06-03-2019, 10:02 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Markam - 06-03-2019, 11:30 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Egon Bigmemes - 06-03-2019, 11:42 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Markam - 06-03-2019, 11:51 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Egon Bigmemes - 06-03-2019, 11:54 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Markam - 06-03-2019, 01:58 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Wildkins - 06-03-2019, 06:10 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Markam - 06-04-2019, 02:30 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Its Raisu - 06-04-2019, 03:25 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Spectre - 06-03-2019, 06:44 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 08:31 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Miaou - 06-03-2019, 08:32 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 08:33 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Miaou - 06-03-2019, 08:46 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 08:48 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Miaou - 06-03-2019, 08:53 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Kalhmera - 06-03-2019, 09:42 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Backo - 06-03-2019, 08:50 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Thunderer - 06-03-2019, 09:41 PM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Spectre - 06-04-2019, 03:58 AM
RE: Battlegroup Cambridge Feedback - by Jayce - 06-04-2019, 04:02 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode