Players Warned:bd]-Ryu.Okamura, bd]-Muramoto.Tenshin

[Okamura]

Right, first of all, this will be reviewed with the newly received evidence/statements, which unfortunately, cannot be backed by any proof.(NANI?!)
Now, lets move to the text in red.
1: exactly what we are trying to do.
2: you were not treated unfairly. This is a very minor warning as a result of you issuing a second minor demand.
3: this is irrelevant. We did not mix roleplay in administrating. I'm not even sure understand the meaning of this rule.

1. It's what you're supposed to do, but you haven't done it. This is a revenge sanction because someone's bad attitude elicited a roleplay consequence and instead of giving them a stern warning for such behaviour, you've instead chosen to encourage that type of behaviour by processing a motivated violation report without proper investigation.

2. We haven't been treated unfairly, but you haven't treated us equally. See the above.

3. Your job is to ensure the smooth functioning of the roleplay environment. The rule means that your job and its implications and rules must always serve the roleplay enviroment and never be used as a tool of arbitrary application. Yet you've admitted your own ignorance of the implication of this very crucial sentence. You've processed a motivated report and mixed administration with the flow of roleplay by warning us for slapping someone on the wrist for bad behaviour. And before you even think about suggesting it, no I have no interest in trying to sanction the other person. This is a roleplay server, his character is free to insult mine but likewise I am free to punish him for it within the scope of my ID rules. If I wanted to finagle with technicalities, I'd be focused on my day-job. It's extremely poor form, for you an administrator, to say that you don't understand one of the rules that you are supposed to follow.
I wanted to walk away from this with faith that you were committed and thorough with your own established procedures, but you've instead given me doubts. I don't think you're the devil because of this but you've lost my faith.

Thank you for your time, this is my final response. Repeal this warning or do not, that's up to you, I will go back to trying to salvage my immersion while everyone else entitles themselves to protection from consequences for bad behaviour. The team has made their support for behaviour such as this very clear in its authoritarian approach to faction diplomacy. Refer to the Custodi and Unioner incident as a relevant precedent of just how far the team is violating its own mandate. This game is no one person's sandbox, we'd all appreciate it not being treated as such.

Thank you for your time again.