(07-24-2019, 12:15 PM)StyleR Wrote: There should be a minimim requirement for age when picking a game master.
I don't believe for 1 second that a 22/23 years old GM that spent a lot of time ingame can be objective and unbias. He simply lacks the maturity for this position. This is my own opinion and take it as such. Minimum would be 30 if you ask me.
People wouldn't get picked for the position if they weren't mature enough. Age is fairly irrelevant.
Yes thats why we have so many 20y/o managers, priministers and presidents. Age is directly correlated to maturity. There are exceptions as always but dont talk nonsense.
Your own personal bias about younger people having the position is showing. Contrary to your belief, age is not directly correlated to maturity. It's largely related to life experiences that an individual goes through, as there are many adults both here and elsewhere who simply cannot handle some situations with a modicum of civility and maturity in mind. Temper tantrums happen even to people in their 40s. It could be a variety of reasons from being mentally unprepared or lacking the experience to confront a scenario when faced with one.
Maturity is dependent on life experiences, which doesn't really have anything to do with how old someone is.
Currently unable to consistently be present in the Community due to life constraints.
![[Image: rherh3.png]](https://i.postimg.cc/Kj3ZvKXp/rherh3.png)