Thank you everyone

[Stucuk]

I am sorry to make it sound that way. In this topic it's black and white. I am here for the topic and not me.

That makes no sence, everyone is here to post there own views on the subject.

With the coded integrated there would be no need for sanctions. Only be cause the object in which to determine whether or not to refuel will be based on your willingness to survive in combat. IE IF you don't refuel your a sitting duck in battle. Impulse won't dodge missiles. So far most of the opposed are fighters.

As i stated before, If properly implemented it would ruin the fun of Freelancer(Thus no point playing). Roleplay is not designed to being Real Life to a Game, its designed to allow you to imerse youself into a imaginary world without all the annoyances/hassles of real life like running out of fuel. People play Freelancer, like any other game for fun, not so we have to check to see if we have enough fuel every time we take of just so we can play the game.

Trader need more RP jobs and pirates/terrorist need different events. Military needs Actual Limitations to determine who's winning a war.

1. You know what, a Traders life is one of Trading, thats it. Traders Trade supprisingly, they don't do anything else, they just Trade.
2. If by events you mean what pirates can do in freelancer then there limited by the game and RP of a pirate.
3. Freelancer doesn't have the ability to show who is winning a war.



One thing to note, even if this idea was implemented, it WOULDN'T get players tradeing fuel between each other as they would just buy it on a station.

---