I don't mean to pick apart the posting but I can't help but have questions. Mostly stemming from this appearing to be a "progression" of established elements. Don't take anything here as being intended to "shut down" this idea, but rather just trying to either understand it better or provide some clarity where it may be needed.
Quote:>allowing the nominally civilian government to wrest control of the formerly stratocratic state from its "Lord" Commander.
This seems to be mixing things in a bad way. Primarily, there is no "stratocratic state" to "wrest control of". That said, the civilian government already had control of itself.
Quote:>Sever ties....The Legion is strong alone.
>Rekindle ties with the Unioners.
No comment
Quote:>the Gallic collaborators in Bering
Without a doubt, Hellfire Legion is indeed hostile to Gallic Royals. Though, with regard to Harmony, there hasn't been an RPable interaction showing them being aligned with Gallic Royals. Basically, you don't know what you don't know and, personally, I try to stay within that boundary.
Quote:>Stabiline-using Maltese
In what way is this a negative trait for it to be viewed negatively?
Quote:>stolen property (i.e. The Abaddon, the Ravager)
Not even sure where to start here between the Abaddon's fate being left to the Legion by the very Commonwealth you're aiming to represent... or the Ravager being definitely under the control of Legion / Commonwealth and there even being active RP to get the damned thing fixed up and even updated. (by that terrible Stabiline-using Republic of Malta menace)
