I'm agree that WPs and chance to be sieged because pob become pain in ass is correlating.
but in same time:
Quote:Which is why long term POBs with established cargo of repairs and huge pool of HP will not be targeted even if there are no weapon platforms. In general weapon platforms are not a consideration to siege base or not. So removing them would not lead to more sieges. And even if there are more sieges, that would force player response to siege where you see battles happening and most likely siege fail in the end because people would not care about actual destruction but would enjoy action and roleplay around the siege.
Dunno, we sieged Siloso for sake of conquest and our RP was about destruction of this. Response tbh right now dont matter at all, only dedication of siegers and defenders, and their free time per player. If siegers have more players who can log 24/7 they will win no matter what defenders would do. Weapon platforms tho hindered us, because took away 1-2 players, who sitted on repair ship. And 1 Siege turrets dred equialent to 2 cerb BS.
(I mean, not like WP really helps in this case, but they force siegers to more complicated tactic. If remove platform, needed some equialent then)
Your arguments is right, but partially, mostly for house space like liberty.