(11-29-2019, 03:02 PM)Black Smoke Wrote: The amount of people that have dominated snub fight by going around and catching people unexpected with a SNAC is pretty damn high.
Yeah, even for them it's months and weeks of trying to manage a fight in which they can achieve what you described.
As for the class, well, I know some people including Ramke who posted here who simply stop flying the class.
You are making an axiom of bombers should be a threat to fighters. In which case I don't understand why Cruisers should be a threat to Gunboats if we apply the same logic. Yet battleship SHOULD be and is a threat for everything, which you specifically pointed out few posts ago. Why don't we make battleships without anti-snub weaponry so we get them to play with other classes like you are argumenting for bombers? Then again it's me failing to understand unbiased approaches of a person who never did cetrain things in this game and yet is somehow a balance dev. Excuse me on that, but you seem to be way too flatly with your decisions.
Because a Cruiser's role is to support larger capitals while being a threat to anything smaller, and a Bomber is not meant to threaten a Fighter. What's the point in flying a Fighter if a Bomber does the same job and can severely cripple caps on top?
As I said I am against bombers to be able to do conventional damage to fighters aka having them guns who can actually damage fighter unironically. But SNAC hits is not replyable and is at least allowing to get a fighter to shieldrun for some time and get some time to breath. But I am against of them completely useless against the fighter as they are now.
And come on, cruisers are good against everything, you are calling that a 'support' ship.