Quote:Isn't it obvious what's different? There's a 1 billion credit payment, which was never needed before for changes like these. Staff saying yes to being able to do something does not equal the request being approved, so you're gambling that 1 billion payment which isn't even refundable. All in all, you're still at mercy of the Dev team whether or not they like it at all, and if it conflicts with their narrative you're boned for two whole months. Also, the promises of no lobbying, etc are hard to believe as there's a precedent for that not being met.
Yeah, and that why imo we should also get good answers why request was rejected in case. That what would make it better than current system which like attempts to cry in void. Then it wouldnt be just additional layer of bureocracy, but actually formalised process.
Reality check this proposal isn't bound by your opinion and you can get told a plethora of reasons as to why your request is denied - if that's the real reason at all.
![[Image: Lythrilux.gif]](https://sig.grumpybumpers.com/host/Lythrilux.gif)