Firstly, access to comms that you weren't involved in is a pretty sketchy move. Just because it was mentioned in a comm between the NC- and the Overwatch does not insinuate that the infocard should be implied differently. If you're implying that you have access to NC- comms and records, then I'd like to see where you were authorized any of the said information.
Secondly, nowhere in my brief post did I state that Amenta has plot armor. Nowhere in the infocard does the wording state that the ship has plot armor. The only infocard that literally states that any ship has plot armor will always be the Missouri. Nowhere else.
However, the infocard does state that the ship is, quote..
Battleship Amenta Infocard Wrote:.. constantly prepared to be on the move.
No station is unfindable. I'll admit that. What isn't doable is..
Considering the ship is 'constantly prepared to move out', I find it hard to believe that you can track it wherever it goes. It may be stationary in-game, that much isn't fixable. RP-wise, it's fairly similar to how the Carcassonne was able to 'stay undetected' within California. They knew it was there, yes. Could they find it? No.
Treat the Amenta the same. As per the infocard.
Lichtenfelde can't be helped, and frankly isn't even in the same realm of circumstances. None of the 'charting' RP is legitimate as far as the infocard is concerned, and frankly it really should be changed if it's to stay where it is. The amount of times that place has been the fallback point of fights in Delta is laughable, and really should be changed if infocards are to have some amount of credit.
I'll once again ask you to amend the post. I don't expect you to, but the request is there nonetheless.
Thanks.
![[Image: mHWFxPI.png]](https://i.imgur.com/mHWFxPI.png){kind=small}
![[Image: UuJsIzJ.png]](http://i.imgur.com/UuJsIzJ.png)
![[Image: JBFuYKi.png]](https://i.imgur.com/JBFuYKi.png)
![[Image: PdU2YZD.png]](https://i.imgur.com/PdU2YZD.png)