Cruiser LM/Razor Balance Vote

[Lythrilux]

You can't argue that the SNAC is a seal club yet be perfectly fine with the state of mortars, in essence. As Justin said, having both anti-snub and anti-cap on a single gun/load out is dumb.

May I ask why the snubs are engaging the caps in any way, shape or form? Is this a veteran joke I'm too new to get? Is this a winning strategy? Should I be 1v1ing Cruisers in my SHF? or my LF?

Also, why are we shocked that anything meant to fight large ships is wildly destructive against small ships? If you drop a Tomahawk Cruise Missile on a car in real life, one would expect the car to be destroyed. Weapons of that magnitude are meant for vehicles such as tanks, warships, and buildings such as bunkers and bomb shelters. So when you use a baseball bat on a snowball, I'd think the result would be one obliterated snowball, not a broken baseball bat that's conveniently hated by every special snowflake out there.

The situations that prompted me to create a discussion on this are ones where a cruiser has joined an active snub engagement, assists a potential pure-snub engagement, or assists with engaging and chasing down a lone snub.

This is a game therefore realism arguments are moot. Caps in snub engagements are not fun, and the less tools they have to ruin them, the better.

---