• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Communication Channel
« Previous 1 … 480 481 482 483 484 … 2191 Next »
To: Kingdom of Bretonia Government -|- Subj: Violation of Treaty of Snowdown

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

To: Kingdom of Bretonia Government -|- Subj: Violation of Treaty of Snowdown
Offline The Kingdom of Bretonia
03-05-2020, 11:01 PM,
#6
Member
Posts: 865
Threads: 232
Joined: Apr 2011

[Image: v0qa48p.png]

To: Mister Hans Averbach-Schmitz

We do not regard the ownership of Aland ours by right of conquest, if anything it would be more akin to a prize of war. We feel the need to clarify a singular point: Returning the yard to the IMG was offered as terms for its use and thus was dependent on their cooperation. They did not and so We are not going to reward them for making war on us. They made a bet on Gallia and lost. I would refer you to this series of messages which initiated the crisis. Given our expressed desire to avoid a conflict and a clearly expressed willingness to return Aland once the war was concluded, it is our position that the IMG lost all rights in Bretonia once war was declared.

Once the fighting began, the RHA and members of the Gallic Intelligence services joined in the fray alongside the ALG and IMG. Their side was made clear, therefore we feel there is absolutely no need nor for that matter is there any desire to return the shipyard. It was mentioned, and rejected. Rheinland's concern for the rule of law is respectable, but ultimately, a wasted effort. We await your reply along with the words of the IMG, should you choose to share them.


In service to the Crown,

Alexander East
Secretary to the Cabinet

[Image: IeOloj2.png]
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
To: Kingdom of Bretonia Government -|- Subj: Violation of Treaty of Snowdown - by Bundeskabinett Sekretariat - 03-01-2020, 11:39 PM
RE: To: Kingdom of Bretonia Government -|- Subj: Violation of Treaty of Snowdown - by The Kingdom of Bretonia - 03-02-2020, 01:47 AM
RE: To: Kingdom of Bretonia Government -|- Subj: Violation of Treaty of Snowdown - by Bundeskabinett Sekretariat - 03-04-2020, 08:29 AM
RE: To: Kingdom of Bretonia Government -|- Subj: Violation of Treaty of Snowdown - by The Kingdom of Bretonia - 03-04-2020, 02:06 PM
RE: To: Kingdom of Bretonia Government -|- Subj: Violation of Treaty of Snowdown - by Bundeskabinett Sekretariat - 03-05-2020, 01:36 PM
RE: To: Kingdom of Bretonia Government -|- Subj: Violation of Treaty of Snowdown - by The Kingdom of Bretonia - 03-05-2020, 11:01 PM
RE: To: Kingdom of Bretonia Government -|- Subj: Violation of Treaty of Snowdown - by Bundeskabinett Sekretariat - 03-06-2020, 12:41 PM
RE: To: Kingdom of Bretonia Government -|- Subj: Violation of Treaty of Snowdown - by The Kingdom of Bretonia - 03-06-2020, 02:50 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode