(04-20-2020, 09:33 AM)A.Black.Cat.From.Window Wrote: The way from Gallic Junkers to Intelligence Service not very good for lawful faction
(04-20-2020, 09:54 AM)Groshyr Wrote: Most of the Gallic junkers were murdered by the Maquis, however, survived, mostly, joined the GRI and then - the Enclave. Probably this is what Cat meant
GJ ID was a lawful ID. I didn't see any indication in lore they had joined Enclave, but rather most just became Freelancers or joined existing groups in Gallia that would have them (which is what I did with Luc LeMarsh).
(04-20-2020, 10:11 AM)Monsieur Baguette Wrote: From the description it just appears that the OP misperceived one problem existing in game, namely frequent reference to GRI as to Gallic Junkers (like in missions) because the ID and IFF of the latter became the one of the former. Not sure if this is where the idea came from, just a hypothesis.
GJs aren't being directly referenced as GRI, but that GJs purpose was essentially acting as the OG GRI before an actual GRI ID was added.
(04-20-2020, 10:11 AM)Monsieur Baguette Wrote: Still, an intelligence unit comprised of some junkies looks weird. Still, manageable.
GJs =/= Sirian Junkers. Both were very different, and personally I always felt that the faction would have benefitted from a rename to something like Ferrailleurs.
(04-20-2020, 10:11 AM)Monsieur Baguette Wrote: My question is why CR is put more hostile than the Enclave? I am flattered as a member of a pro-enclave faction yet still I do not understand this stance.
Small mistake due to rephacks that don't reflect current things. CR in hostile diplo as well as their part in the objectives list has been removed.