Siege bloodlust

[Lythrilux]

I start this post with a request for robust debate but please! Leave the negativity, and toxic/personal attacks out. No rules-lawyering, but constructive challenging of a view appreciated.

I have made an impromptu list which I think may facilitate discussion, which I hope will benefit the game and engender more enjoyable and positive player experience.

1. Sieges are a valid and part of the game.
2. PoB's are the heart and soul of many peoples raison d'etre to play Discovery.
3. Sieges that destroy the hard work of players is harming the community.
4. Sieges that destroy POB's also destroy ongoing RP, ends potential in-game interaction and substantially reduces PvP gaming pleasure.

Yeah, I can see the arguments for each of those points. I think sieges are often inherently toxic and not constructive to server health. But in some cases they are a necessity to combat toxic POB placement (area denial, JH/JG POBs, mining field POBs etc).

I think Disco as a whole would be much better off if POBs had stricter rules with their placement and couldn't be sieged.

---