POB Siege Balance

[LaWey]

Ok so what is real RP then if not back stories on the forum or RP'ing in-game?

As it also sounds like an argument to protect investments. In recent cases, Enclave is the protected party, they can cause long term damage and can't really be hurt in return in a similar way.

As long as there is some fair bit of rp for a siege its fine, doesnt have to be elaborate. My point was, if a group like the Enclave is here and at it for RP as much as PVP, they might not mind the need to have a base to protect on their end, that requires RP to get along well like a POB.

People decry me for hunting Enclave npc's for cargo when there is not even the slightest bit of Enclave player trade ships going in or out of their space. It does seem like they don't want to bother with a POB or defending their space while being ok with taking out those that do.

Binski. So what you see as POB issue "they can cause long term damage and can't really be hurt in return in a similar way" - is the gameplay-plane problem. Can you stop bringing RP to defend your views?

For RP discussion those Enclave factions have appropriate feedback threads, where you will be explained why their actions make perfect sense inRP.

I see that you want EVE alike contesting system, and i even know guys who did this conception by specialised event servers, which battles decided changes of border worlds claims, but current disco far away from this conception. VERY FAR AWAY. Good it or bad.

Current POBs owners know, that if they express their RP as POB building, other players can express their RP as POB destroying. Nobody forced to build POB for RP, so its entirely fair deal in view of same distribution of RP possibilities.
So fucking stop bring it in every hole, for gods sake!