POB Siege Balance

[LaWey]

Anton, sieging also generates activity, you know when people log in to destroy attackers, there is probably nothing to make this gameplay better. Proposal to make a PoB to destroy another PoB would just raise the number of PoBs, there is enough of them. Ammo used sieging will just make the siege longer and more boring. I cannot see a problem with current gameplay, take care of your base, make weapon platforms and enjoy almost peace life.

Yes, this is indeed why in my vision this is not just another POB, but completely different structure with different traits. But honestly i don't really want this one. I just accept that dirty hack for it can be easier for implementation.
In really i want EVE-alike system.

Ammo based sieges wont make siege longer and boring if guns will have proper amount of ammo and will kill POB faster than siege turrets do it now) Idea not to make siegers go for ammo. Idea to make siegers lose money if they failed.

Gameplay problem that defenders should overgank attackers to state when they wont bother to log anymore. This is root of the cancer here.

In ideal world, siege should be multistaged, with every stage taking 1-2 hours.