Demands to POBs (Rule Poll)

[Skyelius]

First of all, there should be a definition of what exactly is reasonable.

Can Enclave siege Bretonian POBs in Dublin if they have RP about this? Yes, they can. They should not play nice guys who gonna hug your miner because you are civilian.

Can Red Hessians siege POBs within Rheinland and Omegas? Yes, they can. Their nemesis is DHC and, iirc, Kruger - these two corporations are KOS for RH lorewise and thus their POBs as well.

Hellfire Legion? Same.

Outcasts' commit raids around all the Sirius (except for Rheinland) with the help of their allies within the houses. Why should they play nice with the guys who pay bounties against them?

Reasonable should have something less subjective than "you can't siege my pob because it's not reasonable!", you should definite what can and cannot be reasonable. As long as there no definition of this - all threads like this, where you try to protect your Tamagotchi with rules are nothing more than fart to nowhere.

tl;tr - definite what is reasonable or finally stop posting threads like this. Thanks

Groshyr,

Eh. Your point about some "necessary exclusions" from having to make demands seems reasonable. I'll consider this, in part, value-adding feedback.

(Nemesis factions may not need to make demands; some ID clauses or rule exceptions would apply) - Sure

However, your opinion that everything has to be very well defined is not really fair to me. The piracy demands rule is not very well defined; some things can be left to player interpretation. Would you like to challenge the piracy demands rule and demand that it be super specific? If not, please do not label posts or polls as not being useful if @Groshyr simply has personal preferences on forum posts. Are you that special?

---

"It is a cold universe until you know God as your Father, and then it becomes a home. Even the next life simply becomes the Father's house, home."
—David Pawson