Demands to POBs (Rule Poll)

[Skyelius]

The conversation was about reasonable demands but somehow you are trying to turn it into a discussion of what the piracy is

I'm obviously "not trying to turn..." anything - there are some parallels between an already-existing Reasonable Demands rule and a potentially proposed Reasonable Demands rule.

If I knew you were a troll or not capable of debating fairly in a topic sensitive to you, I wouldn't have replied to you in the first place - no more discussing with you in this thread.

For example, why wouldn't all the corporations of a house pay a shared tax to a central account (owned by the GMs) that could be used to refund (part) of the damages the POB owners suffer through POB sieges that end up in POB destruction.

Seems interesting, though this could unleash a whole other discussion because there are already "Lawful Government" circles that have people receiving massive personal profits from extortioning players.

Or you could make something like POB insurance. Where the owner pays a flat rate per Core level and is guaranteed a refund in case his POB ends up being destroyed.

Interesting too - thanks for your post.

---

"It is a cold universe until you know God as your Father, and then it becomes a home. Even the next life simply becomes the Father's house, home."
—David Pawson