FTP Free Trade People Feedback

Hi there Guest,

Existing user? Create account

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

FTP Free Trade People Feedback

Dhomie42

09-04-2020, 12:52 AM, (This post was last modified: 09-04-2020, 12:56 AM by Dhomie42. Edit Reason: Included a second screenshot, just in case. )

#21

Frontier Sheriff

Posts: 424
Threads: 38
Joined: Jun 2019

(09-03-2020, 11:40 PM)sueme Wrote: Too bad your... other buddy... was 1 minute too late after your death, it could have been a fairer fight 2 vs 2 . We like those better too, but RP demands we go after Xenos enemies no matter the situation. Unlike the two LN there at the scene, who refused to attack you and one of them even surprisingly stated so in system wide chat. But, at that time he did demand threateningly that our FTP| player drop the 2 or 3 nomad mines or CM's or whatever he had from some mission (so i guess he did his RP duty).

If you don't like it when people (especially Junkers apparently), have the gall to object to being attacked by you... perhaps you should consider choosing a different profession. Because that's not changing, "official" or not.

In fact, I would be so bold as to say, a faction like FTP| who actively and often defend themselves from Xeno raider attacks deserve officialdom even more for it.

Your definition of a fair fight is an interesting one. 1 SHF and 1 GB on 1 VHF, even if the bomber showed up earlier that wouldn't have made it fair. Also, last time I checked, this is not the [LN] Feedback Thread, nor the 46th| one.

I have no issues with Junkers and Xenos shooting each other, what I have issues with is when someone decides to go guns blazing without a single line of RP. If you honestly think that noRP engaging others is an example of what an official faction should follow, oh boy, do I have news for you then.

(09-04-2020, 12:08 AM)myetal Wrote: Viper is one to talk i've met that xeno 4 times total and each and every time i've met him his RP for attacking consists of one/two words, "die" or "engaging" or his most latest one was "lets begin".
[10.08.2020 16:06:08] XA-Viper.: Lets begin!
[10.08.2020 16:06:39] 2020-08-10 16:06:41 SMT Traffic control alert: FTP|Oprixy| has requested to dock

Thats it, then he was attempting to engage me, i CMed his C/Ds and managed to dock. Now correct me if im wrong but this is also a breach of server rules.

Also liberty police actively deciding not to attack a terrorist i see the corruption within house goverments is growing dailiy.

Last time I checked, this is not the XA- nor the LPI- Feedback threads (provided by "liberty police" you mean the official faction.) If you had issues with XA- before, you are more than welcome to visit their thread.

(09-04-2020, 12:25 AM)sueme Wrote: Not sure how the second battle between VA-Viper and the FTP| player was "witnessed".... which happened in Hamburg not Hudson... while still being in Hudson as the EDITED chat log shows (... with my warnings left out).

As for the rules, is every member of a battle between 2 tagged factions required to state their intentions, separately, before hand? Of course not, that would be silly.

3.6 - Attacking without Roleplay. Players must be given reasonable time to react to hostilities.
Dropping 2 lines of engagement RP would have been enough, even if it was minimal, but it's still better than nothing.

Your second battle started in Hudson, just before the Navy players decided to head back to Cold Bay, and my chat logs are not edited, except for leaving out non-related logs like group chat and PMs. So I'd really appreciate if you could like not accuse people wrongly, thank you very much. And there were no warnings whatsoever, period. Ironic that you accuse me of editing the chat logs when you clearly didn't bother to even /1 /2.
Just to get that straight, I'll include an expanded chat log (without non-related logs like group chat) below along with a screen of the GB's cargo infront of the Hamburg Gate: [-X-]