(12-18-2020, 06:31 PM)Shiki Wrote: Discovery happening years after vanilla doesn't mean you can do things that contradict vanilla lore for no apparent reason. If for centuries Blood Dragons didn't make a separate state, chances are they wouldn't come to that road 27 years after out of the blue.
Pretty much only Mollys got the solid separatist background and good potential for that play.
Each and every faction of course can do everything they want with their RP, but it doesn't make the server any favors if you have more "governments" and "micro houses" than people online on average.
Yes it does. Who's to say this wasn't happening already? Just because there is no Vanilla Lore to support it, doesn't mean it could not happen!
Else we wouldn't have Gallia.
And this isn't out of the blue, it has been a long time in the works by our faction, you're just been so ignorant as to not notice.
We've centralised, under the direct power of our leader. We're less fractured into 'clans'. They essentially don't exist anymore. For all intents and purposes, we're basically a portion of the Blood Dragon's Armada that thinks differently. Think... Rebel Alliance and how they were made up of different cells that eventually amalgamated into one singular force. Except, in our view, the Blood Dragons have splintered in ideals some. You have those who vehemently refuse to change their ways and continue on the same path and us who have decided we need to take things into our own hands and be the change we want to see. Does it make us legitimate? No. Do we aim to do this to change Blood Dragon RP? No, not really.
If anything, I'd appreciate it if the Coalition as allies could be remove from the Blood Dragons NPC faction. Perhaps just make them neutral as they wouldn't otherwise interact, leave the engagement to RP. Then our ID can simply have the relations we have, separate from that of the NPC faction, so that people who desire to keep true to BD lore can do.
So BD can do everything because Gallia and they are centralized. Alright. I suppose we can end this discussion here because obviously none of us is going to be convinced.
Pahaha. The words of one defeated by logic. You're not able to offer a coherent counter responce, you speak like a News Reporter trying to get an interveiwee to say something that supports the agenda the media is aiming for.
Shameful dispray.
You're not even hearing me, you're more concerned with being right, rather than entering into genuine discourse. Pathetic, I shouldn't expect better from this community.
When contending with a monster, you'd be wise to give the devil his due.
