• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Interactive DarkMap
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 14 15 16 17 18 … 780 Next »
Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas
Offline Ilya
02-13-2021, 01:06 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-13-2021, 01:16 PM by Ilya.)
#4
Member
Posts: 50
Threads: 4
Joined: Jul 2008

(02-13-2021, 12:16 PM)James Horatio Creed Wrote: Love the idea of the docking modules being a respawn point for the carriers considering I own a Carrier which is used as a support vessel but up to now we have not used it.
Also the idea of the snubs not being punished for combat docking on the docking modules would be a cool idea so they can restock during battle.

And making the carrier into a support vessel rather than a heavy vessel is a good idea and also means that more caps will be needed to support the carrier from being destroyed.

I would love to see a battle scenario with some of this actually implemented and made permanent.

Overall I think a rework of this would be awesome.

(02-13-2021, 12:53 PM)darkwind Wrote: Tbh, docking module rework was sort of rejected with words
"Too many code changes in one pull request"

To be continued its requiring
to have a lot of code review or to be remade into small parts for easier reviews.

The first one requires big efforts to process and
The second thing requires big mind efforts as well, which makes me hesitant to do.

TBH, looking at these changes proposed, the population density just prohibits their usage in such ways, If we regularly had 100+ logged and good density than some of this would be good and meaningful, however we don't, changes to the carrier have to be meaningful and reflect what the current population allows us to do, and that is besides the coding, I imagine will be a pain, so it comes down to Time=/=Reward ratio,

Will the changes to support warrant the effort required to make this happen? no, they simply would not be used very much.

The respawn idea is tantalising but ultimately is it worth the effort, will it be used lots outside of liberty? probably not, its very niche.

Carrier launch platforms are somewhat redundant with the JD4.

Ultimately, converting to Heavy Battleships may be the most efficient and Cost=/=Reward positive move.

EDIT: Changes should not make the class defunct, and currently some of these changes would simply make it a gimmick and ultimately useless. Admittedly I am biased somewhat, taking away a carriers heavy firepower would gimp Coalition as we don't have a battleship/dreadnaught class, the Tempest serves as both a carrier and heavy firepower platform, removing that would strip us of our ability to lay down heavy firepower.

[Image: oSKG4wq.jpg]
|Sirius Coalition|Information Centre|Recruitment|Communication Centre|Discord|
  Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by LuckyOne - 02-13-2021, 11:19 AM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by James Horatio Creed - 02-13-2021, 12:16 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by darkwind - 02-13-2021, 12:53 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by Ilya - 02-13-2021, 01:06 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by darkwind - 02-13-2021, 01:18 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by LuckyOne - 02-13-2021, 01:45 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by Ilya - 02-13-2021, 02:15 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by Thunderer - 02-13-2021, 02:25 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by Ilya - 02-13-2021, 02:29 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by LuckyOne - 02-13-2021, 03:05 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by Lythrilux - 02-13-2021, 04:00 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by Binski - 02-13-2021, 05:52 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by Thunderer - 02-13-2021, 06:01 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by Firewolfy - 02-13-2021, 08:18 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by Skorak - 02-13-2021, 08:21 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by LuckyOne - 02-13-2021, 08:35 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode