• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Interactive DarkMap
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 14 15 16 17 18 … 780 Next »
Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas
Offline LuckyOne
02-13-2021, 08:35 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-13-2021, 08:36 PM by LuckyOne.)
#16
Armed to the Teeth
Posts: 534
Threads: 15
Joined: Apr 2020

@Lythrilux thanks for the info. Do you perhaps know why the devs went the NPC route on an RP focused server ? I mean RP-in using NPCs as dumb as Freelancer's is really somewhat limited.

@Binski your take is interesting, but multiboxing would just promote more single-player like gameplay. Spawn point carriers or beam to carriers would promote teamwork (alright they could actually worsen "ganking" but only until every lawful suddenly realizes those useless caps that like to idle around various lawful bases can be used as convenient teleport portals to where the action currently is). Or the Bustard could be used as a cool mobile base of operations for escorts.

I feel this could actually impact the "perceived" server pop to be much higher than it currently is. Just needs to have a right price so it's harder to abuse.

I wouldn't go for deletion of docking modules but a split to the Heavy ones that can act as snub beacons and regular ones that stay as they are I feel could work.
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by LuckyOne - 02-13-2021, 11:19 AM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by James Horatio Creed - 02-13-2021, 12:16 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by darkwind - 02-13-2021, 12:53 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by Ilya - 02-13-2021, 01:06 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by darkwind - 02-13-2021, 01:18 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by LuckyOne - 02-13-2021, 01:45 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by Ilya - 02-13-2021, 02:15 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by Thunderer - 02-13-2021, 02:25 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by Ilya - 02-13-2021, 02:29 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by LuckyOne - 02-13-2021, 03:05 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by Lythrilux - 02-13-2021, 04:00 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by Binski - 02-13-2021, 05:52 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by Thunderer - 02-13-2021, 06:01 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by Firewolfy - 02-13-2021, 08:18 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by Skorak - 02-13-2021, 08:21 PM
RE: Carriers, docking modules and the pop density problem ideas - by LuckyOne - 02-13-2021, 08:35 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode