• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Interactive DarkMap
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion Discovery Mod Balance
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 55 Next »
Oh no. SNAC again.

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Oh no. SNAC again.
Offline Pepe
03-30-2021, 08:12 PM,
#1
Moderately rare
Posts: 1,958
Threads: 111
Joined: Apr 2011

Problem with snac is not about power, but tracking - imho. Barrel can move to lead the target even if it's small. So it can hit small ones and remove them from the game instantly (if not plugged in ofc). That's bad, ok I agree.

So... why don't we wield snac in/on bomber's fuselage and make it be forward gun? Aiming would be possible by pointing our ships, making only large ships hittable. Snubs would be hittable only if they want to. Also heavy guns have a recoil and would be logical to build bombers around them (like A-10 Warthog for iRL example).

How could I know that? I tried Claymore SHF and it's FG.

Please? Make snac be a FG and remove incriminated plugin?

Ofc, constructive debate is open.

Thanks!

[Image: 3tN2x9Z.png]
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Oh no. SNAC again. - by Pepe - 03-30-2021, 08:12 PM
RE: Oh no. SNAC again. - by Megaera - 03-30-2021, 08:14 PM
RE: Oh no. SNAC again. - by Prysin - 03-30-2021, 08:17 PM
RE: Oh no. SNAC again. - by L e o n - 03-30-2021, 08:18 PM
RE: Oh no. SNAC again. - by Lusitano - 03-30-2021, 08:27 PM
RE: Oh no. SNAC again. - by Prysin - 03-30-2021, 08:35 PM
RE: Oh no. SNAC again. - by Lemon - 03-30-2021, 08:37 PM
RE: Oh no. SNAC again. - by Pepe - 03-30-2021, 08:54 PM
RE: Oh no. SNAC again. - by Lusitano - 03-30-2021, 08:43 PM
RE: Oh no. SNAC again. - by Pepe - 03-30-2021, 08:43 PM
RE: Oh no. SNAC again. - by Couden - 03-30-2021, 08:58 PM
RE: Oh no. SNAC again. - by Venkman - 03-30-2021, 08:59 PM
RE: Oh no. SNAC again. - by Pepe - 03-30-2021, 09:08 PM
RE: Oh no. SNAC again. - by Lusitano - 03-30-2021, 09:04 PM
RE: Oh no. SNAC again. - by Lusitano - 03-30-2021, 09:17 PM
RE: Oh no. SNAC again. - by Binski - 03-30-2021, 10:17 PM
RE: Oh no. SNAC again. - by Lemon - 03-31-2021, 12:50 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode