¤¤¤¤¤¤¤Thanks to both of you for your replies, it reassured me in the feasability of such a thing (I mean, a DM, okay, but I thought it'll add more to the already Atlas-esque bureaucracy it shows, but I think it's really something we need).
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤FYI, it really stemmed from the massive frustration I accumulated IRL when I applied for jobs, applied more than a hundred times and barely got ten replies, all negatives. Discovery acts a bit like that about reports. It should definitely be more transparent before and during the report process - I saw a parallel between the awful way of responding by human "resources" depts. from companies, and the current reporting system.
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤And also, when your report was done in a bad manner, such as evidence lacking or anything, you don't get any notification about it, or even what was wrong, so I thought, why not make them add what was wrong in your report too? It will make the report process better for all parties, in my opinion.
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤Now, I am just awaiting moderators/administrators input on these ideas: DMing if the report was correct or incorrect; and if it was incorrect, what went wrong, and this, simply, no need to rewrite the Bible.
![[Image: 4YNVxKW.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4YNVxKW.png)