• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Community Feedback
« Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Why missiles are ineffective? (Full form on google forms)
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Missiles lack the damage over time or efficiency in relation to guns
6.61%
8 6.61%
Missiles are too slow, giving the opponent plenty of time to react
12.40%
15 12.40%
Missiles lose track too easily
14.05%
17 14.05%
Missiles have low lifetime (Explodes by themselves too soon)
4.96%
6 4.96%
Munition reserves are too small
4.96%
6 4.96%
Missiles have low agility, making them easy to avoid
14.88%
18 14.88%
Missiles have very low refire, limiting damage output or giving the opponent plenty of time to react between salvos
5.79%
7 5.79%
Lack of diversity in missile wepons
9.09%
11 9.09%
Munitions are too expensive
3.31%
4 3.31%
Ammo limitations also limit usefulness in long battles
8.26%
10 8.26%
Missile weapons lack the "Multi-role" aspect of guns
4.13%
5 4.13%
Countermeasures are too effective
11.57%
14 11.57%
Total 121 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles
Offline Tenshi Kuonji
10-08-2023, 07:30 AM,
#31
Rheinland Night Knight
Posts: 347
Threads: 46
Joined: Feb 2019

(10-07-2023, 10:42 AM)g18em2b Wrote: Missiles should always hit something. And countermeasures should be of different types. For heat seeking missiles there should be specific countermeasures and for radar guided missiles there should be radar jamming countermeasures. There should also be more expensive hybrid countermeasures. Regardless of the type, the agility and speed of a missile should always be at least 10x that of the most agile ship in the game. Also, there should be remotely operated missiles, which always hit unless destroyed.

in Freelancer we have no radar/jamming/heat seeking ...
They actually do is Radar-Lock_On_Target, but the idea of Countermeasures could be nice niche ... like some that excel on large ordnance (torpedos / capital missiles), other for fighter missiles and other for CD's ...
Of course every CM can distract any inbound projectile, but with different stats ...
Fortress Can have some of 80% for Torpedos and Capital Missiles/Torpedos, while having 50% for the rest
Silencers can have 80% against CD's while only offering like 50% against Torpedos and Missiles
Heavy can have 70% against all, with the ability of being really costly and damn slow between each salvo but can intercept more than 1 CD Missile
While maybe we get a Jammer Countermeasure that can fight against fighter ordnance with 80% and 50% against anything else ... dunno, play with the results could be kinda nice

[Image: bVCB4sP.gif]
Discord : Tenshi Kuonji#3786 ✙|✙ Other Networks : Tenshi Hidden Links
Best Ranks Ever: 1|IC Kaiserliche Polizei Rheinland (KPR| Tagged Vessels)
The Arctic Trickster:Tales of Foxy Tenshi ✙|✙ Links: (soon)
Blogger | Amino | Medium | WordPress | DevArtStories

And so shall they fall, all who bear our mark. No matter who they are, no rank, nor title, nor power shall shield them. When the mark finds them, their time is nigh.
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Fab - 04-25-2022, 03:10 PM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by CommodoreShawn - 04-26-2022, 02:18 AM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Binski - 04-26-2022, 03:47 AM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Saronsen - 04-26-2022, 09:08 AM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Venemon - 04-26-2022, 09:17 AM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Lemon - 04-26-2022, 09:41 AM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Novascova - 04-26-2022, 09:59 AM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Saronsen - 04-26-2022, 10:16 AM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Binski - 04-26-2022, 05:42 PM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Novascova - 04-26-2022, 10:20 AM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Backo - 04-26-2022, 11:31 AM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Thunderer - 04-26-2022, 01:11 PM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Lemon - 04-26-2022, 03:27 PM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Thunderer - 04-26-2022, 03:33 PM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by CommodoreShawn - 04-26-2022, 04:58 PM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by James Greed - 04-26-2022, 05:58 PM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Venemon - 04-26-2022, 06:28 PM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Binski - 04-26-2022, 07:10 PM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Darius - 04-26-2022, 06:04 PM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Fab - 10-03-2023, 02:36 PM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Kauket - 10-03-2023, 03:05 PM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Toaster - 10-03-2023, 03:13 PM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Sally - 10-03-2023, 03:48 PM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Uknown - 10-03-2023, 04:17 PM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by pillow - 10-03-2023, 07:56 PM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Fab - 10-03-2023, 09:39 PM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Fab - 10-03-2023, 04:52 PM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Traxit - 10-03-2023, 06:27 PM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by OutpostOzymandias - 10-03-2023, 09:49 PM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by g18em2b - 10-07-2023, 10:42 AM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Tenshi Kuonji - 10-08-2023, 07:30 AM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Saronsen - 10-08-2023, 07:36 AM
RE: Community forms: Feedback on the current state of missiles - by Erremnart - 10-08-2023, 08:36 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode