Rule Inconsistencies?

[Raekur]

Akumabito - Not all sanctions are based on lies. Granted only 1 report I submitted has ever resulted in a sanction but there was no arguing about it, the guy cussed in open system chat.

As towards sanctions, what I would LOVE to see happen is a reply from the admins to the poster if a sanction is turned down and exactly why. This would give feedback to the poster and maybe some viewpoint that he was unaware of that would explain why the action was not a violation. Otherwise, the only thing that a poster can speculate is that the report that he filed was ignored and that leads to the belief that the admins show bias towards certain people. That NEVER ends well for either side.

Maybe add a couple of steps to the sanction process.

Admin group receives the report.
Assign a particular admin as a contact person for the report.
Specified admin send acknowledgement that the case is being reviewed to the poster.
After 2 weeks of deliberation either a sanction is granted or a reply to the poster is sent explaining where the poster was mistaken on his interpretation or intent of the rule in question.

This will strenghten the relationship between the players and the admins.
Its better to be told you were wrong about a rule, then to think that either the admins dont care or are protecting someone.