(10-26-2023, 08:15 AM)Czechmate Wrote: Yes, I saw as extremely biased when the government took my 13-21 score in a respawn event, outside of house space where you cannot even do roleplay consequences, to try force an entire faction to be FR5d without a single piece of evidence or roleplay or answer when asked for evidence. And then people proceeded to bully our members with this nonsense based on that biased failed oorp difference of opinion about PvP in a respawn event outside of house space they brought into roleplay. For literally over year and a half, some still do.
We also saw biased that government didn't allow 1st rep in because of personal dislike despite us being the number one most active faction in Liberty for a while now and many non OFs, not even on tracker reps being in and voting.
You will say you dislike us, we are low quality, and going 13-21 lost a 100-161 score event, but that stuff should not be your call, GOVS shouldn't act and make sweeping big moves against people's characters in roleplay because of oorp reasons and dislikes.
We also had the feeling requests for licences etc. Have been denied because it was "us" more likely than if e.g. a gov member would apply.
Stuff like this will now be prevented, we know that licence denials, attempts to oust a player from an ID for oorp reasons will be stopped before they go out.
What if this stuff you are saying won't change, because staff will agree that having Liberty Insurgency capital ships for Liberty Navy is stupid. And as per current rules, unofficial factions are not invited to government. Even though LibGov allowed in people who are smart enough to be in LibGov.
And I honestly don't know what event score has to do with anything, it was during my absence from Discovery, so if you would be so kind as to provide some background and links to that, it would be appreciated.
Context: Insurgency respawn event in Vespucci. I was then part of 46th, leading all roleplay and logging of Liberty when it came to going after the insurgency in RP for a long time.
I wanted 46th to win the rewards portion so I was going after kills recklessly, ending up with 13-21 K : D Score. Liberty lost with 100:160 score in the end. 46th proceeded to kick me for this, fair enough, I tried to make 46th win but it made them look bad, we didn't agree on
how to play the game, factions can have oorp disagreements on how to play the game, which happens all the time, and people part ways.
The thing was, this was a story event. The story premise was that Delaware went YOLO in recklessly not waiting for Ohio as canon character Brandt was cocky Insurgency hater glory seeker. My character lead the campaign. It was outside of house spacewhere roleplay consequences cannot be applied.
What gov did is they took this oorp disagreement and did this https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...sciplinary
and then proceeded to not show any evidence or reply, send an FR5 to staff against the entire first armada based on this. There are people still bullying my faction because of that post that would never be approved now to come out. It's same stuff as happened between Bretonia and Liberty, same stuff as to why reps of some non ofs were allowed in and some weren't, why licences seemed to be favourable to people who gov liked.
Other houses
There have been huge lapses before. There was a time when in Rheinland random players made a new non-OF RM, kicked [RM] lead out for inactivity and proceeded to give themselves votes.
I think we all know what happened in Bretonia - illegal sieges, oorp crap with Liberty, power-gaming. Gallia had its own issues I don't have to talk about here
