Rule Inconsistencies?

[Dusty Lens]

No one has to prove to obvious, it's obvious that sanctions are not done in a fair, consistent manner.

Your the one defending it, right?

Wait a moment!

I'll be the first to admit most sanctions are straightforward, cussing, modding, etc...

It's that 5% or so that aren't straightforward where the biases are allowed, where the deck is stacked depending on who you are rather than the rules and the evidence.

So 95% of sanctions -are- awesome, unless you've jumped your own ship again, but you have issue with the last 5%; those 5% illustrating a tangled web of favoritism and deliberate corruption on the side of the admin team to make the 'factions' uh, happy I guess.

I would contest that sanctions are done in an exceptionally fair and balanced manner.

I wish I could find the blasted thing, but there's a good example of Korrd doing an about face a bad sanction that he was called out on.

*thinks* I believe the only sanction that I believe was a fully bad call involved the Tigershark incident of note and legend. That was a bit out of left field and done in poor form.