LF compared to VHF

[BaconSoda]

I'd say:
LFs vs. VHs = fine
LFs vs. Bombers = ligth fighters RUN!!!

In other words, bombers have so much armor that these small things aren't able to inflict enough damage in less time than it takes to manufacture a whole new ship. Especially when they're using combo 2x shieldbusters, 2x something that bites.

I have to disagree. Light Fighters are at their best when fighting bombers. In my BPA days, I kept two OPG bombers shieldless and was raining Tachyon down on one of them without taking a hit. It might take a bit, but Light Fighters are at their prime when fighting Bombers.

Also, 2x Shieldbusters is arguably bad idea. It's far better to have 1x Shieldbuster and 3x Hull Bunsters on a Light Fighter...

I do believe that Light Fighters that aren't bugged are fine as is.

---

[8:32:45 PM] Dusty Lens: Oh no, let me get that. Hello? Oh it's my grandma. She says to be roleplay.
[12:49:19 AM] Elgatodiablo: You know its nice that you have all that proof and all, Bacon... but I just don't believe you.