NOTICE: New Policy on POB Movement, IFF, and Name Requests

Hi there Guest,

Existing user? Create account

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Kusari Super Alloy Shipments - 49,450 / 2,000,000
LSF Arms Shipments - 30,250 / 2,000,000
LSF Munition Shipments - 26,230 / 2,000,000
Pirate Black Market Shipments - 33,100 / 1,000,000
Dragon Bounties - 1 / 10,000
KOI Bounties - 0 / 10,000
LSF Bounties - 4 / 10,000
Samura Bounties - 0 / 10,000

Latest activity

NOTICE: New Policy on POB Movement, IFF, and Name Requests

Fab

11-08-2024, 04:22 PM,

The Consul's Terror

Posts: 766
Threads: 135
Joined: Sep 2013

(11-07-2024, 12:16 AM)EisenSeele Wrote: In-system relocation due to mod system update related POB relevant solar object or mining field movements
EX: Shifting of a trade lane or mining field can justify the movement of a mining or trading POB situated deliberately in proximity to said trade lane or mining field

Major inter-system relocation due to mod system updates resulting in the loss of mining fields
EX: Removal of a resource mining field from a system can justify the movement of a mining POB to another mining system

Are bases that are built to collect encounter codes/blueprints/prototype components included in these conditions? Encounters/battlezones are pretty much mining fields, I guess.

ARES / Faction Information / Feedback