(12-23-2024, 12:48 PM)Seapanda Wrote: This isn't space GTA. Violating the game lore and ID restrictions for the sake of "generating server activity" is a lazy excuse for what essentially is POB spamming.
As the original post says, it's out not outright banned though. If you want to put a POB there to farm PvE encounters, you are welcome to provide the appropriate amount of RP to justify that move in an SRP.
I also don't have any stakes in this, but how are those PoBs different to this one? I don't care about either PoB, I don't mind either one, but where is the line with "breaking the immersion"? Cuz you cannot tell me this is a fully immersive PoB. Or do nomad systems have a special treatment because some people cry harder? But than Omicron Kappa had no human base in it in vanilla and look at it now, no? So nomad words do be getting colonized by humans.
The PoB you linked will get looked into, thanks for that.
And sure, Kappa had no presence before, but it does now. I'm sure something similar could be made for some other nomad systems if one can come up with RP for it. Like it was said in the OP, spamming bases just to farm a PVE encounter is not okay. Create a story around it, write RP about it, submit an SRP to have a POB built there. Make it at least make some sense.
Which rule is violated by any of these PoBs? And what is the guarantee that if some RP is done, nomads won't just blow that PoB to pieces (the same as what they can do with the current ones)? Would people need to SRP each PoB and stay at the mercy of the backlog each time until their SPR gets approved or whatever? In a perfect world, yes, RP can be done, but there aren't even some guidelines by which one can judge which is acceptable RP and which isn't (to get an SRP approved). So time wasted for nothing. Why is a valuable encounter there (in terms of equipment is drops) in the first place if people "shouldn't be there"?
