• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 780 Next »
Galileo Mining Rights

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Galileo Mining Rights
Offline Catto
01-09-2025, 06:50 PM,
#9
Member
Posts: 113
Threads: 11
Joined: May 2024

Which point would an unaffiliated corporation assisting extraction by Kusari and Libertonian authorized corporations fall under?

Consider that mining ops can be assisted by haulers from other IFFs for both lore and practical reasons. There are arguments for and against allowing that.

Obviously it'd be better to involve more people and actors as is in terms of pure productivity and overall economy health. However, allowing said unaffiliated actors to affect regulated extraction would also inevitably make one side unable to compete, due to the overall political landscape favoring it. In the spirit of any agreement zoning out the system, assistance from the outside should be prohibited or heavily limited.

A more sensitive extension of the issue is that not only miners and haulers can be involved, but also defense forces can operate in the region to protect mining operations. This can lead to skirmishing, proxy attacks, etc. I think it necessitates designating a neutral party to oversee defense in the region, and it should be one unaffiliated with any of the mining corporations.

In summary, if platinum mining is to be distributed between DSE, Kishiro, Samura, and Bristol, they need to demilitarize their presence in the area and hire a common defense contractor to oversee security, whilst limiting transport and mining assistance to either solely themselves or their immediate allies.
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Galileo Mining Rights - by Barrier - 01-08-2025, 02:34 PM
RE: Galileo Mining Rights - by 9th.Legion - 01-08-2025, 07:49 PM
RE: Galileo Mining Rights - by IahimD - 01-08-2025, 08:34 PM
RE: Galileo Mining Rights - by 9th.Legion - 01-08-2025, 08:47 PM
RE: Galileo Mining Rights - by TheSauron - 01-09-2025, 12:39 PM
RE: Galileo Mining Rights - by Barrier - 01-09-2025, 02:09 PM
RE: Galileo Mining Rights - by rwx - 01-09-2025, 02:36 PM
RE: Galileo Mining Rights - by Barrier - 01-09-2025, 03:20 PM
RE: Galileo Mining Rights - by Catto - 01-09-2025, 06:50 PM
RE: Galileo Mining Rights - by A Magpie - 01-09-2025, 10:02 PM
RE: Galileo Mining Rights - by Catto - 01-10-2025, 01:53 AM
RE: Galileo Mining Rights - by Barrier - 01-10-2025, 02:03 AM
RE: Galileo Mining Rights - by Catto - 01-10-2025, 02:18 AM
RE: Galileo Mining Rights - by Bristol Constructions - 01-10-2025, 05:24 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode