5.2.0.9

[Lord Caedus]

How?
Provide examples of how this would be more complicated than the update to the FL / BH Id lines or how this would created "complications".
All thats required:
- server rule regarding forum posts
- ID lines
The community creates the rest. Staff input minimum, output max with community. Where is this counterproductive?
You've got a handful of factions being played by the same people.
This would allow for a smoother transition to in game activity - create a post, deem it "hackable", gets hacked, activity in game. The creator of the post has deemed the post can and will be hacked and will create activity. This is an agreement between 2 players inRp to bring activity.
Give me counterproductive examples.

The fact that by adding in at least four additional IDs that effectively all do the exact same thing is only going to dilute the already limited playerbase of people that play house unlawfuls in the first place. Also like Erremnart above me said, you don't need to have intel IDs to do any of this, you can simply RP it out regardless. This is ignoring the fact that Intel IDs as a concept are antithetical to unlawful IDs, with them being very much opposite sides of the spectrum of roleplay. Intel IDs mostly exist to carry out operations on behalf of their house outside of that house's space. House unlawfuls exist to operate purely within their house, or on the immediate border. The concept of a Molly ID ship flying to Tohoku to conduct espionage is laughable at best. I'll even give you the idea of them conducting espionage against other unlawfuls that they are hostile to. Let's say a Bundschuh wants to go spy on a Unioner, and to do so inRP hacks a comm by the Unioner on the forums. Why does the Bundschuh need to be an Intel ID to do that?

---