• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Interactive DarkMap
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Communication Channel
« Previous 1 … 82 83 84 85 86 … 2194 Next »
ATTN: Liberty Forces HC

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

ATTN: Liberty Forces HC
Offline bakugone
01-24-2025, 10:00 PM,
#18
Just some random dude
Posts: 459
Threads: 47
Joined: Sep 2017


[Image: Qxv7EkN.png]



[Image: 20240325203905%21Li_n_grp.png]
Incoming Transmission
Liberty Navy, 2nd Fleet
Admiral Marcus Robinson









Director Maxwell.


I share my view with Fleet Admiral Kemp-Smith, Admirals Asterius, Ferguson, Uhmen and Tanner as well my colleges from LSF TacOps and External Threat Division.

The Sudbury is our main concern. There is no point in denying that it's the bigger threat. Lane Hackers just do not possess the capability to reverse-engineer a Military technology in such a short-time - nor, I believe, the required resources to do so. As such the only logical solution is to secure Planet Sudbury, and then go for the secondary objective of recovering Nidoyo wreck.

However, as mentioned by the First Fleet Admiralty and Admiral Boehm himself, you did not specify the timeframe of such an operation, nor enough information to come to a satisfiable conclusion, Director.

We cannot spend time digging a logistical corridor for a month before it becomes a strain on our Military forces. Time and manpower is of essence here. As such, I request alongwith the First Fleet Admiralty that you share any relevant intelligence before we can go forward with the 'single, resolute plan of action'-that you had mentioned.

That, then, brings us to another topic - I need to object to your assessment on Yellowstone. Although it sits in a critical junction that disrupts smuggling and pirate operations in California system, it can be relieved by Battlegroup Bravo (Concord) very easily and redeployed to Ontario in short notice. I believe Yellowstone will increase our operational security, as the Battlegroup Bravo cannot transit safely the Ontario Jump Gate, without possibly causing a situation closely resembling the Alberta Incident, nor Bravo can provide sufficient reinforcements through the Jump Gate, should we need to salvage this operation.

My views on recommendation to redeploy Yellowstone with Admiral Fergusson are matched - however, I do understand that the battlegroup never faced this big threat with this much stake on-the-line other than pirates in Coronado, as such, they need to be relegated to internal security of the Damaged California Jump Gate perimeter against opportunistic terrorist attacks, and ONLY called in as the last straw if the operation severely deteriorates.

Unless you provide Intelligence that will, without doubt, determine that Tuscaloosa and Lehigh will be enough, I hope this recommendation will be reviewed sufficiently and not fall on deaf ears.

I believe, your last concern should be reorganization. Director.

That would be all, thank you.

Marcus Robinson
Admiral, 2FLT
Liberty Navy


Important: This communication remains the property of the Libertonian Armed Forces and is subject to the jurisdiction of the Neural Net Communications Act 807 A.S, Section 30. If you have received this message in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the communication.

Reply  


Messages In This Thread
ATTN: Liberty Forces HC - by Director Adam C. Maxwell - 01-21-2025, 12:46 PM
RE: ATTN: Liberty Forces HC - by TheDoctorXI - 01-21-2025, 08:14 PM
RE: ATTN: Liberty Forces HC - by The_Godslayer - 01-21-2025, 09:37 PM
RE: ATTN: Liberty Forces HC - by The_Godslayer - 01-24-2025, 10:23 PM
RE: ATTN: Liberty Forces HC - by CO. Slate - 01-21-2025, 09:47 PM
RE: ATTN: Liberty Forces HC - by Chronicron - 01-21-2025, 09:50 PM
RE: ATTN: Liberty Forces HC - by Liberty Navy - 01-22-2025, 12:45 AM
RE: ATTN: Liberty Forces HC - by DarkTails - 01-23-2025, 03:02 AM
RE: ATTN: Liberty Forces HC - by Spectre - 01-23-2025, 08:28 AM
RE: ATTN: Liberty Forces HC - by Operative Siren - 01-23-2025, 09:05 AM
RE: ATTN: Liberty Forces HC - by Director Adam C. Maxwell - 01-24-2025, 03:25 PM
RE: ATTN: Liberty Forces HC - by Akhetaten - 01-24-2025, 04:03 PM
RE: ATTN: Liberty Forces HC - by Liberty Navy - 01-24-2025, 06:45 PM
RE: ATTN: Liberty Forces HC - by Xithon - 01-24-2025, 06:56 PM
RE: ATTN: Liberty Forces HC - by TheDoctorXI - 01-24-2025, 07:46 PM
RE: ATTN: Liberty Forces HC - by Spectre - 01-24-2025, 08:12 PM
RE: ATTN: Liberty Forces HC - by DarkTails - 01-24-2025, 08:21 PM
RE: ATTN: Liberty Forces HC - by Blake Wayne Van Leer - 01-24-2025, 08:52 PM
RE: ATTN: Liberty Forces HC - by bakugone - 01-24-2025, 10:00 PM
RE: ATTN: Liberty Forces HC - by Chronicron - 01-25-2025, 12:12 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode