Capships, increasingly slower fighters? Or strategic weapons?

[Mannock]

I read all the topics here and... like others I have my own proposal.

Battleship: in history there were the Queen of the Seas, until Carriers and submarines appear. They can take out every vesell small that it, big guns and capable Flak firepower. But a swarn of fighters and bomber can destroy easily. Slow but powerfull.

Battlecruiser: and intermediate between cruisers and battleship. Less powerfull than a battleship but more armoured than a cruiser. A little bit slow than a cruiser, it can be a match for a Battleship (winning 2 of every 5 one on one).

Cruiser: really the most habitual ship. The jack of all trades, can mount any combination of armament and use them in every action. They were (in any fleet know) the ships most used.

Destroyer: in reality is an escort ship. It can mount little big guns and flaks.

Gunboat: here is a very, very good ship. In fact, its only a very fast, agile and with good armament (but limited).

Bomber: they have an objetive kill caps ships and others beyond the scope of this game.

Fighter: they must win superiority and destroy little ships (fighters, bombers, gunboats and maybe destroyers).

I think that introduce Carriers can be a good idea (can you imagine a ship with good flak capabilities, medium armour and with dock for some fighters and bombers). Submarines and frigates... their role can be for the gunboats.

That is only an idea, not good nor best than others.

---