• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Interactive DarkMap
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General News and Announcements
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 46 Next »
Policy on 1.0 'Ganking'

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Policy on 1.0 'Ganking'
Offline Maik
03-11-2025, 04:25 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-11-2025, 04:29 PM by Maik.)
#39
Peace was never an option
Posts: 510
Threads: 57
Joined: Aug 2023

I even wonder how this rule will be used for nefarious purposes. Like, guys, we have planned raids going on here instead of random battles where abusing this rule would be appropriate. Otherwise, pretty much any big fight between factions is accompanied by pre-balancing of the sides. There are exceptions, of course, but that's a one-in-ten case.

And let's say there comes a time when this rule goes into effect, that is, we see it in practice. Whether it's malicious intent or compliance with everything “in the spirit of the rules” (a reference to the essence of 1.0), how will you be able to tell the difference? How will you be able to prove to the pirate side that they... Well... Assholes?

And how can you prove to the other side that the pirate side aren't assholes and have done everything solely to comply with the spirit of 1.0? I don't get it. It's an unnecessary burden on the Administration team.

The current rules on gank are quite acceptable. But this innovation - is it really worth it? So far I have not seen a single positive feedback anywhere, in any chat. I think it would be a higher priority to establish piracy norms where demand-mount is actually acceptable and fair to both sides. I mean, this problem is a few years old: a lot of people have gotten sanctioned simply for demanding more, because there are no clear limits anywhere, and even I don't always know if what I did was fair or not.

Now imagine that a third of the people on the server completely don't realize this.

It might be worth working in that particular direction, in establishing... “Limits” of pirate requirements and certain frameworks? We need this one officially.

Discovery is a server of dreams.
And I'm a big dreamer.
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by EisenSeele - 01-13-2025, 06:31 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Culbrelai - 01-13-2025, 08:35 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by EisenSeele - 01-13-2025, 09:01 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by L1ght - 01-13-2025, 09:19 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by EisenSeele - 01-13-2025, 09:26 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Vlaicone(Ted) - 01-13-2025, 03:30 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Semir Gerkhan - 01-13-2025, 03:42 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by StellarViss - 01-13-2025, 04:01 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Big Bison Bessie - 01-13-2025, 04:08 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Seapanda - 01-13-2025, 04:19 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by BMF - 01-13-2025, 05:13 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Wesker - 01-30-2025, 01:49 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Barrier - 01-30-2025, 03:01 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Lemon - 01-30-2025, 07:19 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by EisenSeele - 01-30-2025, 07:38 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Steven.Hiller - 03-11-2025, 11:38 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Madvillain - 01-30-2025, 03:24 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Kauket - 01-30-2025, 06:40 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Reeves - 01-30-2025, 05:49 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by EisenSeele - 01-30-2025, 05:59 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Vlaicone(Ted) - 01-30-2025, 06:10 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by EisenSeele - 03-11-2025, 01:37 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Maik - 03-11-2025, 01:40 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by monmarfori - 03-11-2025, 10:27 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Karst - 03-11-2025, 11:18 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by TheSauron - 03-11-2025, 02:07 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by EisenSeele - 03-11-2025, 02:18 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Corile - 03-11-2025, 10:43 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by EisenSeele - 03-11-2025, 12:23 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Karst - 03-11-2025, 01:04 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Soban - 03-11-2025, 11:15 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Culbrelai - 03-11-2025, 11:25 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by TheSauron - 03-11-2025, 01:06 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Steven.Hiller - 03-11-2025, 01:45 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Lusitano - 03-11-2025, 02:09 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Sombs - 03-11-2025, 03:01 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Soban - 03-11-2025, 03:30 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Eternal.Journey - 03-11-2025, 04:22 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Maik - 03-11-2025, 04:25 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Jayenbee - 03-11-2025, 04:32 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Vlaicone(Ted) - 03-11-2025, 04:33 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by BobMacaroni - 03-11-2025, 04:52 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Lusitano - 03-11-2025, 05:46 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Oggdo Bogdo - 03-11-2025, 05:46 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Sombs - 03-11-2025, 05:51 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Lusitano - 03-11-2025, 06:55 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Kanzler Niemann - 03-11-2025, 06:44 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by The_Godslayer - 03-11-2025, 06:54 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Emperor Tekagi - 03-11-2025, 06:58 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Traxit - 03-11-2025, 08:30 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Lord Caedus - 03-11-2025, 08:35 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Sombs - 03-11-2025, 09:53 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Lusitano - 03-11-2025, 10:48 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Sombs - 03-11-2025, 11:35 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Lusitano - 03-12-2025, 01:05 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by mm33dd - 03-12-2025, 01:33 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Lusitano - 03-12-2025, 02:15 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by EisenSeele - 03-12-2025, 02:24 AM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Sombs - 03-12-2025, 02:54 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Lemon - 03-12-2025, 04:43 PM
RE: Policy on 1.0 'Ganking' - by Steven.Hiller - 03-14-2025, 09:22 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode