Staff Feedback Thread

[Jeuge]

I post very rarely but I find this sanction strange and worrying.

Once again, Discovery is hit by a lack of transparency — especially troubling when a 1.0 rule exists, paving the way for the community to lose trust in the admin team

the so-called ‘consequence’ given by the admin remains unclear, this sanction ultimately does nothing good for the community. Instead, it will raise questions, sow doubt among players, and create a toxic, paranoid atmosphere on Discovery — something that everyone wants to avoid.

But some solutions exist . Sanctions of this kind should be handled with full transparency ,made public, with evidence accessible to all while of course strictly protecting the anonymity of the complainants. This should not be a problem for the admin team, who must support the decisions they make and take full responsibility for them(I hope so).

Fly safe.

---