Rule Update: AI Generated Content

[Haste]

Thank you for clarifying the server's stance on AI-generated content; however, I believe this restriction may be overly restrictive and stifle creativity and efficiency within our community. AI tools can serve as valuable aids for writers, helping to overcome language barriers and enhance storytelling without compromising personal voice or effort. Banning AI-generated text entirely might discourage innovation and limit participation for those who rely on such tools to contribute meaningfully. I respectfully urge the staff to reconsider this policy, perhaps by allowing controlled and transparent use of AI assistance, rather than an outright ban that could hinder genuine engagement and growth.

Thank you for your well-articulated and evidently optimized contribution to the discussion. Your message presents a compelling perspective on the potential benefits of AI-assisted writing, highlighting themes of inclusivity, efficiency, and creative enhancement — all delivered in a tone of carefully calibrated neutrality that mirrors the very tools under debate.

However, the core concern remains unchanged: roleplay in this community is intended to be a shared creative exercise, driven by individual voice, style, and intention — not by automated synthesis. While the idea of “controlled and transparent” AI use may sound appealing in theory, in practice it opens the door to content that lacks the nuance, spontaneity, and genuine engagement that define organic collaboration.

We recognize the value of assistance tools for proofreading and editing, and the current policy already permits such use. But generating content wholesale through prompts, however eloquent the result may appear, risks reducing creative participation to prompt engineering rather than actual writing. That’s the line we’re drawing.

We appreciate your input — truly — and encourage further discussion. Just preferably written by you.

---