(06-19-2025, 02:49 PM)Sombs Wrote: That has already been answered.
You should really worry less about it. The ruling is really more about the fairly blatantly obvious cases. If people want to feel rebellious and try to have the AI write the content in such a way that it is hard to distinguish, that's good on them. As long as the AI-generated content isn't equally as bad and soulless as any other low-effort posting, you don't need to be worried at all. Whether people want to flex about replacing genuine effort with genuine-looking effort, though, is really their own issue.
Oh yeah, and who decides that? Who decides if it's AI or just someone who writes not up to your Standards? And even more important, how will you be able to prove it in more than a "Trust me, Bro" manner? Will you use AI to check if it is AI? Right now, every Rule Violation can be proven without a Doubt. But this is a Rule that you can't enforce without going into the "Trust me, bro" Region.
You will have to have people like me that Write in there native way of Writeing (German) and I can guaranty you that my style of writing would definitely flaged as AI by an AI, and that because I am not writing how they write as a Native English Speaker.
So yes, I think having this rule is nice. But I also believe this rule will not be able to be proven without a Reasonable Doubt. Also, what would stop people from simply flagging other people's RP as AI? I mean, you can prove nothing. At AI images, there is at least sometimes a Watermark. But AI Texts don't have this Mark.
