(07-06-2025, 09:57 PM)EisenSeele Wrote: Speaking just as a BDM player - There never has been any requirement to explicitly write out justification for demands that are in line with ID permissions - a pirate would not need to say "Hey, I am a pirate and I derive income from selling goods and/or services that I have procured with very little overhead and at a massive discount - from you - please give me your cargo" so much as "give me your cargo"
An undercover freelancer MND character would not need to out themselves as MND by writing out that they are confiscating your xeno relics under Rheinland legal jurisdiction - just issuing a demand gives plausible deniability and the potential for being written off as a pirate.
Nah man.
Undercover is Undercover for a reason.
If you go by IFF, you have no right to demand anything.
If you go by ID, you have every right to /1/2/3.
If you go by IFF + ID, you didn't specify what or who are you. Just a random encounter. This going on like this is setting up a bad precedent where me flying Freelancer IFF with Freelancer ID can pirate smugglers cause they are smuggling (No, that will not happen. Or maybe?). Not to mention It reflects poorly on you, and we (We = the community) like you. Issue an apology for the lack of clarifying RP, throw him some credits, tho he doesn't need them and take this incident into consideration when debating on future changes on IFF vs ID topic.
