(07-13-2025, 10:12 AM)LuckyOne Wrote: Also, shouldn't IC technically try to tax non-Corporate ships (i.e. Freelancers and Zoners) since those are the ones probably not paying for the insurance, and running quasi-legal deals?
I mean, I guess you could argue that you can extort the Corporates you have leverage over, and the non-Corporates because you don't have leverage over them and you want it, but at that point it's just open banditry, and that really isn't the intention for the ID.
For a full-on unrestricted pirate, see Junker ID.
(07-13-2025, 10:32 AM)R.P.Curator Wrote: I think all the posts related to this topic have proven that "pretty much everyone" is not an accurate statement. I'm not being obtuse, I just pointed out something that is misleading and can be interpreted wrongly. Its my fault for hitting my head on the wall and expecting the wall to change.
Cheers and thanks.
Yeah no, you're the only one who misunderstands this specific aspect (which also has nothing to do with the IC ID in particular). I've only seen one other person misunderstand the "ships" terminology in IDs, and they were kind of a troll.
So no, the definition works fine.