• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Interactive DarkMap
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Communication Channel
« Previous 1 … 16 17 18 19 20 … 2196 Next »
To: Bamburgh Company | From: Civil Defence Initiative

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

To: Bamburgh Company | From: Civil Defence Initiative
Online jammi
02-03-2026, 02:02 AM,
#3
Badger Pilot
Posts: 6,913
Threads: 415
Joined: Aug 2007
Staff roles:
Story Dev
Economy Dev

[Image: CaMcuE1.png]


[Image: YbM1i3f.png]



From: Inspector Grace O'Sullivan, CDI.
To: Bamburgh Company.
CC: CapitalExpenditure@cdi.police.br
Topic: Enquiry into surplus ships and refurbishments.
Clearance: EYES ONLY




Mr Sanders

Thank you for your prompt attention on this matter.

I will need to discuss the suggested options with our capital investment team, and the Chief Inspector. Despite that, my own preliminary thoughts are that the Oasis liner would likely be the most suitable for our purposes.

My understanding is that the Titanic and Hegemon are bulk freight and ore carriers, with their cargo compartments typically being depressurised and not rated for human habitation. I suspect it would be expensive to retrofit these vessels to a standard the Home Office would find acceptable.

The certification process alone for "non-standard and novel" prison ship hulls would likely be time-consuming enough to offset any savings we made on the procurement.

On the other hand, the liner already possesses the interior functionality we are interested in, and is a "known quantity" in terms of the regulatory environment. The engines may end up being a surprisingly minor issue, as we are intending to deploy the vessel as a largely stationary prison hulk in Sprague orbit.

We would primarily need the station-keeping thrusters to be active, with any significant repositioning being facilitated by the local Lifter fleet.

Would you be able to draw up a pricing estimate for the vessel, sans engine repairs? I have also taken the liberty of attaching the Home Office's I024-B standards specifications set, which describe the required internal features and characteristics of Bretonian prison liners.

As noted, I will take this up for discussion with the relevant people within the CDI. It would be very useful if we could send an inspection team aboard to review the vessel too.

The offer to explore construction options surrounding a permanent prison is also noted with appreciation, however this is beyond our budgetary constraints at the current time. Should this position change in the future, we will be sure to include you in the offer to tender for the resulting contracts.

Yours sincerely


[Image: CaMcuE1.png]

Inspector Grace O'Sullivan | Civil Defence Initiative | Bretonian Police Authority Special Constabulary | Unit 24, Stanbrook Hall, Millgarth Street, Wharferdale City, Aberavon, Planet Sprague, Omega-3. BW0101 WD56 3LO. | Web: https://nn.CivilDefence.police.br | Mail: gosullivan3@cdi.police.br | Tel: +7755631 230234 230 |


[+]Attached files (1)
Mobile_prison_facilities_technical_standards_HO/I024-B.doc

[Image: redon.gif]
[Image: f0D5b.png][Image: O2Zu5.png][Image: IlS2I.png][Image: yNeaK.png][Image: 9zbjr.png][Image: D7RGg.png]
News article library, feedback and content requests.
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
To: Bamburgh Company | From: Civil Defence Initiative - by jammi - 02-02-2026, 06:12 PM
RE: To: Bamburgh Company | From: Civil Defence Initiative - by Bamburgh Company - 02-03-2026, 01:32 AM
RE: To: Bamburgh Company | From: Civil Defence Initiative - by jammi - 02-03-2026, 02:02 AM
RE: To: Bamburgh Company | From: Civil Defence Initiative - by jammi - 02-07-2026, 03:58 PM
RE: To: Bamburgh Company | From: Civil Defence Initiative - by jammi - 03-03-2026, 02:39 PM
RE: To: Bamburgh Company | From: Civil Defence Initiative - by jammi - 03-06-2026, 02:15 PM
RE: To: Bamburgh Company | From: Civil Defence Initiative - by Bamburgh Company - 02-03-2026, 09:18 PM
RE: To: Bamburgh Company | From: Civil Defence Initiative - by Bamburgh Company - 03-02-2026, 01:03 AM
RE: To: Bamburgh Company | From: Civil Defence Initiative - by Bamburgh Company - 03-07-2026, 02:55 AM
RE: To: Bamburgh Company | From: Civil Defence Initiative - by Bamburgh Company - 03-07-2026, 03:41 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode