Proposed ID Re-Wording

[Behemoth]

I thought Igiss already said that you should *NOT* be pirating in anything bigger than a fighter or something along those lines..

Whatever Igiss says, consider it the rule of god <G>

His word is just as good as the Server Rules :)

[snapback]33899[/snapback]

*Looks at Wolfpack's sig...*
hmm... BattleStar-pirate hein?! xD

Concering the "terrorist" factions, I just give Xenos as an extreme example.

See for example, Bundschuh, Unioners, Blood Dragons, Hogosha, Golden Crisantemums, Farmers Alliance, they are all terrorists, each one with their own beliefs.

There are plenty of choices so far so I believe the Freelancer ID should be what it is right now.
I also say that because a Freelancer is a starting path to the inumerous ways out there.

I definitely agree that Neutral ID traders should not have immunity to pirate factions or factions that control systems where they pass by.

This could be discussed a bit so they can be asked to drop their cargo holds in special circumstances (such as passing through minor with Artifacts) but not to be shot at on sight, no matter what kind of rep they have - they are neutral after all.

Talking about pirating, I am against anything bigger than a VHF.

Trade companies use fighter or heavy fighter escorts.
It's unrealistic to have military vessels escorting a company convoy.

Traders can have agreements with another factions or "wing factions" though.

That would widen the role play and keep it simple.

For example, [IND] could have something like [IND][Merc] with that kind of powers, but this isn't important. They can have whatever they like - its private after all - as long as they dont actually trade on battleships... :crazy:

Now, if someone has a Republican Shipping ID, or IMG ID for instance, they should not be allowed to have escorts higher than a VHF.

---