• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Interactive DarkMap
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Unofficial Factions and Groups
« Previous 1 … 364 365 366 367 368 … 392 Next »
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Should RFP have bombers?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
75.86%
22 75.86%
No
24.14%
7 24.14%
Total 29 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use?
Offline Jinx
10-01-2008, 03:58 PM,
#16
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

from an outsiders point of view - i d try not to limit players much on what they use... but ask them what they want to use. - if they all say, they want a bomber, another solution might be needed ( an assault by light fighters maybe - that rips them all apart )

a "healthy" balance from like 2/3 Phantoms and 1/3 bombers might be best. - the upcoming SHF is an alternative, but functions in a different way. its meant to be a long range patrol ship - not a quick response fighter class bomber.

so the SHF is meant to operate independly along the borders. its main function is to spot weaknesses, deal with minor threats and .. maintain the borders intact. - a bomber however is more ( or should be more ) a unit that scrambles when there is need for it ( like a capital ship - or a hardened transport )

there should be more fighters than bombers - but of course, the bomber as such is more powerful than most fighters. - the rheinland bomber is especially powerful, cause it has a large powercore and is one of the smallest bombers around.

so - if possible, i d try to really keep a 1 : 3 balance, might work to give the players a choice to either fly a fighter OR a bomber, but not both. - as a roleplayed char, i d expect a bomber to need a different training form a light fighter... so it would be funny if the same pilots piloted both. - and for the player, there is a real decision to make - does he want to be a bomberpilot for the faction or a fighterpilot ... but not both.

[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by Monk - 10-01-2008, 04:59 AM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by Zapp - 10-01-2008, 05:20 AM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by Tenacity - 10-01-2008, 05:22 AM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by Orin - 10-01-2008, 05:26 AM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by Monk - 10-01-2008, 05:26 AM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by Xing - 10-01-2008, 05:38 AM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by Monk - 10-01-2008, 05:41 AM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by Tenacity - 10-01-2008, 05:46 AM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by Monk - 10-01-2008, 05:51 AM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by Erythnul - 10-01-2008, 05:54 AM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by Tenacity - 10-01-2008, 05:57 AM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by Lupusy - 10-01-2008, 06:37 AM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by jpo - 10-01-2008, 06:52 AM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by Tenacity - 10-01-2008, 06:54 AM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by Monk - 10-01-2008, 03:48 PM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by Jinx - 10-01-2008, 03:58 PM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by Cawdor - 10-01-2008, 03:59 PM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by Stoat - 10-01-2008, 03:59 PM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by tfmachad - 10-01-2008, 04:07 PM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by Qunitinius~Verginix - 10-01-2008, 04:43 PM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by SGTMatt - 10-01-2008, 05:19 PM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by looqas - 10-01-2008, 05:59 PM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by Varyag - 10-01-2008, 06:08 PM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by tfmachad - 10-01-2008, 06:22 PM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by chopper - 10-01-2008, 06:34 PM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by Monk - 10-01-2008, 08:24 PM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by Cawdor - 10-01-2008, 10:09 PM
Should RFP follow LPI in terms of ship use? - by Othman - 10-01-2008, 10:25 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode