Faction Control of Capital Ships... or...

[Jihadjoe]

I have one simple question for this thread:

Why do factions want to restrict independants when they are not meant to be trying to 'solve' OORP matters?

Answer is they all want to be power hungry cap whores themselves, without anybody to oppose them.

Bearing in mind I am one of the people who has started a cap restiction policy, in a place where the server is most heavily populated, and most heavily populated with caps at that.

Does this statement from ryoken imply that I did it to increase my own power? Or so that I could fly a cap without any fear of other caps flying around?
Thank you for being so remarkably optimistic about my personal aims and goals with regards to that... I see you clearly shown me to be what I truely am. A capwhoring, powercrazy, egocentric powergamer... :dry:

On a slightly less sarcastic note... My own cap roster consists of one gunboat, and a battleship and cruiser that are shared amoungst people, and only rarely see the light of day. I haven't used the cap restriction to solve problems with oorp, or for reasons of realistic numbers... I have put it in place in order to deal with the overkill. The terms of it very clearly state the reasons behind it, and so far no-one has been denied their ship outright.

this may well be a roleplay responce to something I find difficult ooc, but I think the attitude with which it is done is good. It has hurt nobodies roleplay, and has (in my opinion) increased the fun factor in liberty tenfold.

Now I can fly my lane hacker dagger without getting shot by a battlecruiser (yes that has happened). And many people's attitude towards how to conduct themselves has changed.

Tell me the negative points of how I'm dealing with this.

---