GMG| Feedback

[Dab]

So you're basically saying, if Kiretsu were in Sigma-13, they would be obligated to have reason to attack us in that situation, but they are told to avoid Sigma-13 completely.

The fact remains that you would still have reason to attack us in that case, and for that reason you are a threat, albeit a small or coincidental one. For that fact alone there is reason to bounty you, at least in my opinion. (I don't speak for the whole guild of course, so we will see.)

But if you do not operate in Sigma-13 anyways, I don't see how this is really a problem. You stay out, you don't have troubles.

If they were in Sigma-13, and specific conditions were met. Ie; you're shooting Outcasts near Yanagi, you'll have Junkers to deal with, not Kiretsu. So unless GMG does something stupid, there would be no hostilities, just like any other faction would have problems if they did something stupid. Its called politics. Thats when both factions do whats necessary, but avoid shooting each other unless their hand is forced. As said, the only time we'd ever shoot each other is if one of us does something stupid, and then it'll be their own fault.

The problem is that when we are in Sigma-13, helping NovaPG clear it of 'Sairs and BHG, a common enemy no? Is that mercs will shoot us even when operating in those mutually beneficial operations. Furthermore, BHG and Mercs don't usually abide by other faction's ZoIs.. We'll have, and have in the past, BHG and Mercs in Hokkaido going for us to get a bounty claim. Lastly, you don't bounty someone until they provoke a conflict. Which neither of us have. By your logic, you best have a bounty on RM and RFP, because there are reasons for both groups to attack you. This works all ways Orin, not just one. If your going to use that logic, you should be using it all over. And if everyone did that, every faction would be hostile to every other faction, and every faction would have a bounty on every other faction..

You say you are bountying us because there is the possibility of hostilities.. Please show me a faction that is neutral that does NOT have the possibility of hostilities with someone else. Everyone has certain conditions that will result in hostilities. The only difference is that I informed you of ours and what we are doing to avoid them, so that both of us can work towards keeping out of each others way. What your doing is a 'preemptive' measure, but something that will be the direct cause of hostilities. While we've done whatever possible, you've done the exact opposite and have aggravated the situation. Are we supposed to just sit back and watch mercs and BHG hound us because a neutral faction put a bounty on us, and cannot present any evidence to back up their claims, nor have they taken any steps towards solving the situation? Or should we retaliate? Any faction in this position would retaliate. We can do it easily, and with Outcasts backing us up, there would be no problem in taking you on, except the fact that it isn't one of our objectives, and our time can more wisely be spent on other things.

So I'll say again; Continue with this course and make a bad situation worse, or work with us to keep hostilities from happening.

---