Faction as a property

[Widow]

Anyways - I think I've irked a few people. That wasn't my intention. Alte & Widow. I wasn't saying you guys would or wanted to nor did I mean to disrespect either of you. If you feel I have, I am sorry; I didn't mean to do so.

Its cool. I had been reading it, and I got a bit worked up over the way the conversation was headed. Thus in turn meaning I let emotion get involved and that made what I was trying to say come out completely wrong, sorry about that.. But, stepped away for a bit and now all is good. :)

Factions do need players, no doubt about that. I use to do something similar to you, Dane, and take on too many things with factions, and then get ragey and mad. But, without getting other people involved, its damn hard trying to run things. It would have to be a factions (At least majority vote of those whose opinions is counted in the faction) decision to close it down, otherwise the members would just say "Screw you, lets find a new leader" and they would carry on. The only thing is it depends on a whole variety of things.

Which is the point I was trying to make. It really does depend how it is structured, the way things are run, who runs it, what people in the group think of said person, and the time/effort/desire of the rest of the group to continue without the leader. If the group doesn't care, then the 'leader' would be able to shut it down and no one could care and less then if it was about, but if it was a group the faction saw it as worth fighting for then people will.

But, my question is, if the group is run with one sole person as the leader/owner, both in and out of RP, what is stopping them from shutting it down with or without the groups support?

---

---

---

---

---

|  Émilie D’Aramitz  |  Pita  |  Jess Doe  |  Charlotte Frank  |  Amelia Scott  |  Sophia Johnson  |  Anais D’Aramitz  |  Sam Swanson  |